Preprint / Version 3

Good modeling practice for calibration applied to ion exchange breakthrough prediction

##article.authors##

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31224/4095

Keywords:

calibration protocol, fixed-bed column, global sensitivity analysis, uncertainty analysis, adsorption, mechanistic model

Abstract

Ion exchange (IX) is a key technology in resource recovery processes for demineralization and fit-for-purpose water production due to its inherent ion-selective recovery properties. A major bottleneck in the optimization of the IX process is the accurate prediction of ion breakthrough times, which has the potential to save on regeneration chemicals by maximizing resin utilization. However, the models used to predict ion breakthrough times are often unreliable due to poor calibration methods and significant uncertainty in parameter estimates. Consequently, we conducted local and global sensitivity analyses to identify the design and operational parameters that contribute most to the prediction of breakthrough curves. The global sensitivity analysis enabled the selection of a limited subset of parameters for calibration, demonstrating that only two parameters, namely the maximum adsorption capacity isotherm parameter and the resin bead particle size, require thorough calibration, resulting in a 76% improvement in the breakthrough prediction. We also showed that the calibration of additional, less sensitive or correlated parameters results in an insignificant improvement of the predictive power, with a 16% to 60% increased uncertainty in the breakthrough time prediction. The model was validated using three independent data sets, which showed a fairly accurate breakthrough time prediction, with a relative error ranging from 1% to 11%. Herein, we propose a robust calibration procedure, based on good modeling practice, that encompasses both sensitivity and uncertainty analyses and therefore provides a basis for process optimization. The framework is presented in a manner that allows for its application to analogous process settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Posted

2024-11-08 — Updated on 2025-02-18

Versions

Version justification

This version corrects minor errors identified in the original preprint, and includes a new validation data set and an algorithm summary in the appendix.