Preprint / Version 2

Quantifying Sand Transport Sensitivity to Dune Shape: Field-Validated CFD with AirSketcher

##article.authors##

  • Wichai Pattanapol Polar Dynamix
  • Khanisorn Thanutwutthigorn
  • Tipaporn Homdee

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31224/5387

Keywords:

Coastal dunes, CFD, Aeolian transport, dune shape, morphodynamics, wind flow modeling, AirSketcher

Abstract

Coastal dune management often alters crest and lee geometry, yet quantifying the transport impact of small shape changes is difficult without heavy models. This paper presents a streamlined, field-anchored CFD workflow (AirSketcher) that ingests a side-profile image, auto-detects the dune outline, and computes near-surface flow. A neutral ABL power law inlet (? = 0.16) is applied consistently across scenarios; turbulence is closed with a one-equation eddy-viscosity model. Model skill is established against multi-height mast measurements at Tomahawk Beach (Dunedin, NZ): height-matched profile correlations are strong (?2 ≈ 0.985, 0.968, 0.840, 0.951), and the solver reproduces stoss speed-up, crest amplification, and lee-side recovery. For design comparison, a geometry-aware transport proxy is formed as a cubic line-integral of speed along a near-surface polyline (Bagnold-type scaling). Three shapes are evaluated under the validated wind: baseline, top-cut, and back-cut. Integrated proxies (∫ ?3 d?) are 804,446, 667,430, and 484,779 m4 s−3, implying ≈ −17% (top-cut) and ≈ −40% (back-cut) vs. baseline. Flow patterns explain the reductions—crestpeak attenuation, muted lee jets, earlier reattachment—concentrating deposition nearer the crest, especially for the back-cut. The approach offers a rapid, interpretable metric for screening dune modifications before committing to fully coupled morphodynamic modeling.


Keywords— Coastal dunes; CFD; Aeolian transport; dune shape; morphodynamics; wind flow modeling; AirSketcher

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Posted

2025-09-15 — Updated on 2025-09-23

Versions

Version justification

v2: Streamlined Methods by merging the former “Inlet and roughness” subsection into surrounding text. Simplified the “Practical recipe” from 6→5 steps by folding the polyline-probe action into the Automatic integrals step (no loss of functionality). Replaced Figure 4 with a dune-modification comparison (Baseline / Top-cut / Back-cut) to foreground scenario changes.