Preprint has been published in a journal as an article
DOI of the published article https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2026.2645822
Preprint / Version 2

Identification and Evaluation of Uncertainty Sources of Materials and Sensors for the Digital Twin Road Initiative

##article.authors##

  • Ahmad Chihadeh Institute for Structural Analysis, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
  • Maria Böttcher
  • David Crampen
  • Erik Kamratowsky
  • Moritz Hagmanns
  • Jitong Zhao
  • Sebastian Ullmann
  • Ventseslav Yordanov
  • Gustavo Canon Falla
  • Simon Schäfer
  • Bassam Alrifaee
  • Marco Liebscher
  • Marko Butler
  • Sabine Leischner
  • Adrian Fazekas
  • Wolfgang Graf
  • Ivo Herle
  • Viktor Mechtcherine
  • Alexander Zeißler
  • Lutz Eckstein
  • Markus Oeser
  • Jörg Blankenbach
  • Michael Kaliske

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31224/5675

Abstract

The Digital Twin Road initiative aims to improve road infrastructure monitoring and maintenance through real-time data integration, computational modeling, and predictive analytics. However, the reliability of such digital twins is significantly affected by uncertainties in both material properties and sensor data. This paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of uncertainty sources within the CRC/TRR 339 – Digital Twin Road project. Material-related uncertainties stem from the intrinsic variability of asphalt, concrete, and soil due to production methods, environmental exposure, and construction practices. These include aleatoric uncertainties from natural variability and epistemic uncertainties from knowledge gaps. Sensor-related uncertainties arise from limitations in sensor technology, calibration, environmental influences, and data processing algorithms. Detailed case studies, including weigh-in-motion systems, drone-mounted laser scanning, and smart materials such as mineral-impregnated carbon-fiber (MCF) reinforced low-clinker concrete, illustrate how uncertainties accumulate and propagate across the Digital Twin Road framework. The classification of uncertainty into aleatoric and epistemic categories is discussed. Understanding these uncertainty sources is essential for improving the predictive accuracy and ensuring a robust representation of real-world road systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Posted

2025-10-24 — Updated on 2025-10-29

Versions

Version justification

Authors list is not correct in the first version