Preprint / Version 3

Balbi Equation - Fundamental Concepts and Principles

A New Explicit, Non-Iterative and Unified Model for Distributed Pressure Drop Calculation in Ducts

##article.authors##

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31224/7176

Keywords:

Pressure drop, duct design, Balbi equation, explicit method, HVAC, viscous wavelength, Colebrook-White, non-iterative

Abstract

This paper presents the Balbi Equation, a phenomenological and semi-empirical formulation for estimating distributed pressure drop in circular ducts. Rather than replacing established methods, the proposed approach offers an alternative physical interpretation of flow resistance while remaining consistent with classical fluid mechanics and established engineering practice.

The model combines analytical development with experimental calibration through five fundamental relationships: (1) the viscous wavelength, λ = (ν / vₘ) · kBalbi, representing an effective characteristic length associated with viscous momentum diffusion; (2) a unified exponential velocity profile, u(r) = vₘₐₓ · (1 − e^(-((R − r)/λ)^α)), applicable to laminar, transitional, and turbulent regimes; (3) a continuous flow-regime function, α(Re) = 1 + 1 / (1 + (Re / 2800)⁴), providing a smooth transition between flow regimes; (4) a pressure-drop expression, ΔP / L = (2μvₘₐₓα) / (Rλ) · (1 / 1000), derived directly from the proposed velocity profile; and (5) a calibration relationship, kBalbi = Cbase Re^0.25 (ε / Dh)^0.1, which relates the characteristic viscous scale to wall roughness and flow conditions.

The formulation was evaluated against two independent experimental datasets. For corrugated flexible ducts (Dai et al., 2021), it achieved a mean prediction error of +4.5%, whereas the Colebrook–White equation underestimated the measured pressure drop by −14.8%. In gas–liquid–solid three-phase flows (Al-Hadhrami et al., 2014), the phenomenological framework was also evaluated beyond the conventional HVAC application domain. For standard galvanized steel ducts in HVAC applications (Cbase = 0.042), the model yields pressure-drop predictions approximately 21% to 27% higher than those obtained with the Colebrook–White equation under the conditions investigated.

Operating with constant-time computational complexity, O(1), the Balbi Equation avoids iterative processes, offering a physically motivated and computationally efficient formulation for spreadsheet and software implementation in engineering design.

Fundamental equations:

λ = (ν / vₘ) · kBalbi

kBalbi = Cbase Re^0.25 (ε / Dh)^0.1

u(r) = vₘₐₓ · (1 − e^(-((R − r)/λ)^α))

α(Re) = 1 + 1 / (1 + (Re / 2800)⁴)

ΔP / L = (2μvₘₐₓα) / (Rλ) · (1 / 1000)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Posted

2026-05-27 — Updated on 2026-09-28

Versions

Version justification

The principal reason for this revision is the restructuring and refinement of the application of the Balbi Equation to the independent experimental datasets of Dai et al. (2021) and Al-Hadhrami et al. (2014). These sections have been revised to improve the methodological description, calculation procedures, comparison with established approaches, interpretation of the results, and discussion of the model's scope and limitations. Additional revisions were made to the theoretical development, phenomenological interpretation, robustness discussion, and overall scientific presentation of the manuscript. The reference list and relevant technical details were also reviewed and updated for consistency. This version is intended to provide a clearer, more rigorous, and more transparent presentation of the proposed formulation and its experimental evaluation.